![]() Put another way, the Employer, Job Description, and Examiner characteristics in the present study resulted in a total R 2 of. 02 ∗∗) all accounted for a statistically significant portion of the variance found in Dissemblers, F(12,76) = 3.24, p <. 17 ∗∗), and Examiner characteristics (ΔR 2 =. 15 ∗∗), Job Description characteristics (ΔR 2 =. 4 DissemblersĮmployer characteristics (R 2 =. Each statistically significant result is presented and discussed next. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis demonstrates that, in the present sample, sets of employer characteristics, examiner characteristics, and situational factors explained a statistically significant portion of the variance in examiner approach to fraud (see Table 9-4). Turvey, in Forensic Fraud, 2013 Hierarchical multiple regression analysis of examiner approaches to fraud
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |